The Agentic Engineering Scale

Published ....
Last modified ....
From Stamford, CT

Share this post on BlueskySee discussion on Bluesky

There's an emerging scale in the software industry around how engineers are adopting AI assisted development in their workflows. So far I've mostly seen this been shared around in smaller circles, or within individual organizations, and I expect that a formal definition may never arrive and it will continue to shift as we get better and better tools in the space.

That being said - I at least wanted to document what that scale looks like today, from my perspective and see if it resonates with others as well.

I've mostly broken it down into 6 tiers:

0. Effectively no AI use

   a. The engineer writes all their code by hand b. The only interface to AI is mostly the same way that we used to collectively use StackOverflow or Google

1. Minimal AI usage

   a. The engineer uses editor auto-complete, or tab suggestions only

2. Agentic Beginner

   a. This engineer is beginning to use tools like Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, etc, however they often will still run those with strict permissions, manually reviewing and accepting changes or actions by the agent

3. Agentic Intermediate

   a. This engineer is more hands off than the previous one with their use of agent harnesses b. Likely running 2-3 additional agents, but mostly on completely unrelated tasks or repos c. May be running their agents in "yolo"-mode, but still reviewing the changes at the end of the session by hand

4. Agentic Advanced

   a. Running multiple agents at once on the same task (e.g. using sub agents or agent teams/swarms) b. Heavily relying on agents to self-review changes, however they may still review some changes here and there